Monthly Archive for August, 2006

dinner and conversation

Kev and I have talked about the name thing a couple of times, especially recently (with the blog post)

Dinner: grilled cheese sammiches made with extra sharp vermont cheddar, thin sliced granny smith apple, and bacon. And tuscan white bean soup. From…a mix. I can’t be gourmet all the time. Darned good, though!

Conversation:

ESC: you still OK with whatever I choose for my name?

Kev: yesss…of course! Just…two rules.

ESC: yeah?

Kev: my name has to be in there, and we don’t do that hyphenated thing with the kids you wrote about in your comments. We can hyphenate their names, but it has to be consistant.
ESC: Oh yeah, I wouldn’t hyphenate the kids* names.

Kev: OK then. Whatever you decide is fine.

ESC: *grins* love you!

Kev: love YOU!

*KIDS??? No. Kid. One. ONE ONLLLLYYYYYYY!!!!!

other blog updates

I’ve updated the knitting blog AND at long last…the wedding site! Email me if you forgot the address of the wedding site.

A very important opinion poll

Mostly for the ladies, but I’d like some male input as well.

Why do I do these interactive posts on friday, just before the weekend when everyone stops reading blogs and commenting? Maybe I’ll leave this up for a while.

OK, I am getting married in 6 WEEKS OH MY GOD!!! One MAJOR decision I have to make at some point is…my last name.

On the one hand…I’ve had my last name for a long time. I’ll be thirty in December, so almost thirty years of the same last name. My relationship with that name has been rocky, it’s often mispronounced, and it’s easy to make fun of. Though growing up, most people made fun of my first name, and it was my brothers who bore the brunt of the taunting for the last name (those of you privy to my last name can probably figure out why).

But…I’m proud of that name. It’s my family. And though there are some members of my extended family that I’d rather not have to deal with…dammit…I love my family! And there have been long years of emotional and financial support, putting me through college and grad school, that it would almost be a slap in the face to say “OK! Now I’m Dr. [Kev's last name]!

On the OTHER hand, getting married means becoming part of a new family. And I have been so lucky in that Kev’s family has welcomed me as a member of the family, almost since the first time I met them. Though we come from very different backgrounds, they have embraced me as one of their own. I want to be able to honor that, and symbolize that I have indeed become a member of their family by taking their name.

The OBVIOUS answer here, and the one I’m sure everyone is thinking, is “gee, why don’t you just hyphenate?” Which is definately a possibility. While both of our names are unique, they don’t sound all that terrible together. It’s not like we’re both Polish and have 12 sylable names containing many W’s and Z’s.

However, at least one person in my lab who has a hyphenated last name has warned me off of it, saying that having a hyphen in your name is a major PAIN IN THE PATOOTY, as credit card companies and the like have a difficult time recognizing the hyphen. Which to me just seems silly, because I know ALOT of people who have hyphenated names, and it seems like these companies need to get with the times.

One of our post docs kept her maiden name. However, privately she is known by her maiden name, as she lives in the conservative, family oriented suburbs (much to her chagrin at times - it’s the county that used to have the warning lable on science books in the schools “WARNING! THIS BOOK CONTAINS INFORMATION ON EVOLUTION, WHICH IS A THEORY, AND THEREFORE IS BLASPHEMOUS AND OFFENSIVE TO JESUS!” or some shit like that) call her by her married name, because that is her husband and children’s last name, and by gosh that must will be her name too! I suppose it’s easier to accept it than to keep correcting them.
I’ve already emailed my advisor. She hyphenated, but I think in her private life just goes by her married name.

Of course, my data pool could be biased. Alot of women in science seem to hyphenate or keep their maiden name. The reason for this, I’ve been told, is that it becomes difficult for people to search for all your papers if you’ve published under two different names. Hyphenating solves much of that problem. So it could be that hyphenating is extremely rare and weird in the “real” world.

So I’m throwing this out to blogland. Women! Married women! Did you keep your husband’s name? Keep your maiden name? Hyphenate? Create some weird hybrid of the two? Why? And have you had any problems with this decision? - ie, credit cards, SS cards, taxes, PTA meetings. If you had to do it all over again, would you make the same decision?

I’d also like the input of the single girls, if this is something you’ve thought about already.

AND, I’d like the opinion of men. What did your wife decide, and were you supportive? Or hurt? Was there any familial backlash if she decided to keep her name or hyphenate?

I must gather data before making my decision!!!!

I don’t like the sound of this…

Directions for my new prescription:

1. pour contents of one packet into a glass or cup

2. add 2 ounces of your favorite beverage (orange juice is a popular choice) and stir vigorously

3. at at least 2 - 4 more ounces of beverage to suit individual taste and stir vigorously again

4. the slightly-textured mixture is now ready to drink

“slightly-textured?”

oh dear.

***edit***

yep.  gritty orange juice.  yum.

oh well, if it WORKS it will be so worth it!

I’ve been saying that alot lately…

Dear NPR,

Specifically, All Songs Considered.

I enjoy listening to your podcast. I find the blend of music you play to be very interesting, and it allows me to be exposed to new artists and new styles of music that otherwise wouldn’t be available to me. Many times, I have found myself thinking “I need to find that person’s CD and buy it.” Then I forget the name. Then I forget to look it up. But still… the thought is there.

I’m writing to you to voice my displeasure at something that occurs in nearly every one of your podcasts. It seems that every week, there is at least some kind of fusion/experimental/instrumental piece that is…just awful.
OK, that kind of music really isn’t my thing…but who’s thing is it? It wouldn’t be SO bad, except that it’s the one song in the program that is 10 minutes long. And most of that is crap. The last 5 minutes of the last one I heard, consisted solely of some high pitched car alarm noice combined with sci/fi lazer sounds.

for

5

whole

minutes.

NPR, your program is not “all songs that make your ears bleed.” Who likes this music? No one, that’s whol

Actually, I can think of only one type of person who might find this type of music entertaining, and while I know that more liberal types tend to listen to your fine programming, I seriously doubt the phrase “dude, let’s get stoned and listen to NPR!” has EVER been uttered by ANYONE.

Please leave me the singer songwriter, please leave me the jazz…but please OH PLEASE…dump the experimental drug music. OR at the very least, give it a 5 minute minimum.

Now if you will excuse me, I need to find a q-tip to clean the blood out of my ears.